Publicly observed correspondence
- Store-associated geofencing publicly documented by Woosmap.
- Consumer-device location monitoring and geofence entry / exit detection.
- Retained user location and visit information, with clustering and recurrent-location analysis.
- Time-based, ETA and isochrone geofencing operating together with location conditions.
- Automated geofence events driving contextual notification and application workflows.
Strongest areas of correspondence
- Element E — retailer-associated geographic location (store geofences).
- Element D — detection of a secondary device within a specified region or distance.
- Element G — communication conditioned upon satisfaction of the geographic condition.
- Element H — temporal condition operating in combination with the location condition.
Limitations requiring additional evidence
- Element C — matching-engine implementation and where relevance is computed.
- Element F — retailer-entered demographic or preferred-recipient criteria.
- Element I — precise communication enable and disable architecture.
- Dependent claims 3, 4 and 5 — purchase-history and search-query inputs.
U.S. deployment questions
- Which United States retailers deploy the complete combined architecture.
- Which integrated CRM or engagement platform performs notification selection.
- Whether all limitations of any single independent claim are met in one United States implementation.
Further technical diligence
- Technical review of the SDK configuration used in identified deployments.
- Review of integration documentation between Woosmap events and engagement platforms.
- Construction analysis of the temporal limitation against ETA-based monitoring.
- Confirmation of the entity performing each recited step for the method claim.
Granted patent position
US12039568B2
Granted United States patent
Emelem Pty Ltd
The public technical record reviewed identifies substantial and, in several claim elements, direct technical correspondence between functionality disclosed by Woosmap and limitations of the granted claims of US12039568B2. Particularly significant correspondence has been identified in relation to consumer-device location monitoring, retailer/store-associated geofencing, historical location and visit information, geographic-condition processing, temporal and ETA-based processing, automated event generation and downstream notification workflows.
The principal matters requiring further corroboration concern the implementation of relevance/matching using previously collected user information, retailer-defined recipient criteria, and the precise conditional communication architecture within individual deployments. Those matters are addressed separately in the deployment and integration analysis.
Accordingly, the publicly available technical evidence establishes a substantive basis for further legal and technical review of Woosmap implementations against the granted United States claims.